Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Harford County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 113
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Harford County, Maryland totaled $2,467,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | James W Galbreath | Street, MD 21154 | $12,144 |
42 | Benjamin L Magness | White Hall, MD 21161 | $11,178 |
43 | Indian Spring Farm LLC | Darlington, MD 21034 | $11,155 |
44 | Piedmont Ridge Enterprises LLC | White Hall, MD 21161 | $11,013 |
45 | Stephen T Cooper | Whiteford, MD 21160 | $10,542 |
46 | Katharine Umbarger-dallam | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $9,926 |
47 | Jonathan P Ruff | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $9,385 |
48 | Susan L Peverley | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $9,296 |
49 | J Robert Tibbs Jr | Havre De Grace, MD 21078 | $8,984 |
50 | Lippy Brothers Farms St | Hampstead, MD 21074 | $8,493 |
51 | Richard Black | Darlington, MD 21034 | $7,892 |
52 | Benjamin Roy Lowe | Pylesville, MD 21132 | $7,636 |
53 | Douglas H Smith Jr | Street, MD 21154 | $7,531 |
54 | Towson Farms | Stewartstown, PA 17363 | $7,135 |
55 | Russell A Gross | Fawn Grove, PA 17321 | $6,873 |
56 | Robert Richardson | Street, MD 21154 | $6,649 |
57 | B Stephen Mcelwain | White Hall, MD 21161 | $6,595 |
58 | George C Reeves | Forest Hill, MD 21050 | $6,362 |
59 | David E Stewart | Whiteford, MD 21160 | $6,330 |
60 | Daniel T Magness | White Hall, MD 21161 | $6,121 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”