Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Harford County, Maryland, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 108
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Harford County, Maryland totaled $631,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | W Gene Umbarger | Churchville, MD 21028 | $2,649 |
42 | Daily Crisis Farm Ltd | White Hall, MD 21161 | $2,622 |
43 | Ann K Edie | Forest Hill, MD 21050 | $2,420 |
44 | Mcguirk Brothers LLC | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $2,403 |
45 | B Stephen Mcelwain | White Hall, MD 21161 | $2,320 |
46 | W Herbert Harkins | Forest Hill, MD 21050 | $2,169 |
47 | David M Keyes | Aberdeen, MD 21001 | $1,897 |
48 | Joshua P Bruno | White Hall, MD 21161 | $1,823 |
49 | James W Galbreath | Street, MD 21154 | $1,546 |
50 | Katharine Umbarger-dallam | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $1,531 |
51 | Carlie Rose Wiley | White Hall, MD 21161 | $1,531 |
52 | Arthur P Gompf | Street, MD 21154 | $1,482 |
53 | G Wilson Tharpe | Street, MD 21154 | $1,458 |
54 | Ma & Pa Holstein/julie Yarrington | Street, MD 21154 | $1,456 |
55 | Benjamin L Magness | White Hall, MD 21161 | $1,402 |
56 | Towson Farms | Stewartstown, PA 17363 | $1,319 |
57 | J Robert Tibbs Jr | Havre De Grace, MD 21078 | $1,240 |
58 | David E Stewart | Whiteford, MD 21160 | $1,219 |
59 | Ernest R Mcelwain | White Hall, MD 21161 | $1,184 |
60 | Daniel S Pieper | White Hall, MD 21161 | $1,171 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”