Total Commodity Programs in Harford County, Maryland, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 29
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Harford County, Maryland totaled $105,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | James H Archer Jr | Pylesville, MD 21132 | $19,053 |
2 | Twin Pine Farm Inc | Whiteford, MD 21160 | $14,583 |
3 | My Lady's Manor Farm Inc | Monkton, MD 21111 | $10,452 |
4 | Rutledge Brick House Farm Inc | Jarrettsville, MD 21084 | $10,452 |
5 | Strawberry Hill Farm LLC | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $9,052 |
6 | Ehrhardt Farms Inc | Baldwin, MD 21013 | $7,221 |
7 | Ma & Pa Holstein/julie Yarrington | Street, MD 21154 | $5,812 |
8 | My Girls Glen Inc | Darlington, MD 21034 | $3,928 |
9 | Quietness Farm LLC | White Hall, MD 21161 | $3,520 |
10 | David M Keyes | Aberdeen, MD 21001 | $2,821 |
11 | Katharine Umbarger-dallam | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $2,588 |
12 | Furn-dale Farm LLC | Fallston, MD 21047 | $2,487 |
13 | Sunnyside Farms LLC | White Hall, MD 21161 | $1,893 |
14 | Benjamin L Magness | White Hall, MD 21161 | $1,854 |
15 | Stephen E Jones | Forest Hill, MD 21050 | $1,773 |
16 | Milton W Martin | Street, MD 21154 | $1,529 |
17 | Ann K Edie | Forest Hill, MD 21050 | $1,190 |
18 | Ma & Pa Farms LLC | Pylesville, MD 21132 | $976 |
19 | W Herbert Harkins | Forest Hill, MD 21050 | $968 |
20 | Daily Crisis Farm Ltd | White Hall, MD 21161 | $967 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>