Farm Subsidy information
Howard County, Maryland
Total Subsidies in Howard County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 205
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Howard County, Maryland totaled $15,499,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Wilber E Dove Sr | Woodbine, MD 21797 | $63,721 |
42 | Mark B Martin | Woodbine, MD 21797 | $63,438 |
43 | Sho Nuf Turkey Farm LLC | Fulton, MD 20759 | $63,197 |
44 | The Lk Trust | West Friendship, MD 21794 | $57,168 |
45 | Frank's Produce & Greenhouses LLC | Columbia, MD 21044 | $56,393 |
46 | Warfield Brothers Joint Venture | Glenelg, MD 21737 | $53,415 |
47 | G & L Limited Partnership | Woodbine, MD 21797 | $46,869 |
48 | Michael Upjohn Beck | Ellicott City, MD 21042 | $46,443 |
49 | Michael A Grodin | Spencerville, MD 20868 | $46,004 |
50 | Harless Business Trust | Woodbine, MD 21797 | $45,931 |
51 | Mrf Equus LLC | Marriottsville, MD 21104 | $43,915 |
52 | Nora Crist Trust | Ellicott City, MD 21042 | $43,074 |
53 | Mary K Garratt | Sykesville, MD 21784 | $40,748 |
54 | Roy Webb | Woodbine, MD 21797 | $39,274 |
55 | Charles A Sharp Jr | Brookeville, MD 20833 | $38,984 |
56 | Charles William Storm | Sykesville, MD 21784 | $38,592 |
57 | Vineyard Farms | Ellicott City, MD 21042 | $38,368 |
58 | Donald Morrison | Dayton, MD 21036 | $38,126 |
59 | W Dale Hough | Mount Airy, MD 21771 | $34,675 |
60 | Donald W Pickett | Finksburg, MD 21048 | $33,608 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”