Total Conservation Programs in Kent County, Maryland, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 223
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Kent County, Maryland totaled $1,080,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Violet T Baxter | Worton, MD 21678 | $3,272 |
82 | Goose Haven Enterprises LLC | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $3,220 |
83 | C Gottfried Baumann | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $3,202 |
84 | Fox Point Reserve LLC | Upper Marlboro, MD 20774 | $3,112 |
85 | Eren L Rose | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $3,072 |
86 | Howard E Rose | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $3,072 |
87 | Douglas Clendaniel | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $3,067 |
88 | Rl Davis Real Estate LLC | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $3,014 |
89 | John Howard Krastel Jr | Worton, MD 21678 | $2,995 |
90 | Robin H Pratt | Millington, MD 21651 | $2,986 |
91 | Duane Lindstrom | Worton, MD 21678 | $2,940 |
92 | Shipyard Farm LLC | Rock Hall, MD 21661 | $2,904 |
93 | Laurette H Sisk | Worton, MD 21678 | $2,903 |
94 | Anthony Van De Wal III | Rock Hall, MD 21661 | $2,893 |
95 | Olan H Simpkins | Millington, MD 21651 | $2,789 |
96 | Marie B Simpkins | Millington, MD 21651 | $2,788 |
97 | Prospect Hill Farm LLC | Kennedyville, MD 21645 | $2,648 |
98 | P Thomas Mason | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $2,619 |
99 | Janet Westerman | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $2,592 |
100 | George H Kendall | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $2,575 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”