Farm Subsidy information
Queen Anne's County, Maryland
Total Subsidies in Queen Anne's County, Maryland, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 469
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Queen Anne's County, Maryland totaled $13,456,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Breeding Farms LLC | Stevensville, MD 21666 | $136,341 |
22 | Godfrey Inc | Sudlersville, MD 21668 | $116,335 |
23 | Tk Farms LLC | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $114,825 |
24 | Schmidt Farms Inc | Sudlersville, MD 21668 | $112,283 |
25 | Eric C Schrader | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $109,134 |
26 | F Kevin Leaverton | Centreville, MD 21617 | $106,611 |
27 | Michael R Bostic | Church Hill, MD 21623 | $106,357 |
28 | Gregory Scott Mcclyment | Queenstown, MD 21658 | $103,275 |
29 | Jck Farms LLC | Queenstown, MD 21658 | $101,508 |
30 | Mark A Eck | Henderson, MD 21640 | $96,497 |
31 | Higman Mill Farm LLC | Sudlersville, MD 21668 | $93,668 |
32 | Schillingers Farm Inc | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $92,957 |
33 | Jackson Livestock | Ingleside, MD 21644 | $89,545 |
34 | John M Cannon | Centreville, MD 21617 | $88,445 |
35 | Three Sisters Equipment LLC | Henderson, MD 21640 | $88,384 |
36 | Keith R Leaverton | Trappe, MD 21673 | $87,695 |
37 | Josh Leager Farming LLC | Sudlersville, MD 21668 | $86,758 |
38 | Moore Bros Inc | Sudlersville, MD 21668 | $83,266 |
39 | Allen H Boyles | Sudlersville, MD 21668 | $83,132 |
40 | Duncan Butler Jr | Barclay, MD 21607 | $82,694 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”