Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Saint Mary's County, Maryland, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 125
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Saint Mary's County, Maryland totaled $326,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bowles Farms LLC | Loveville, MD 20656 | $51,587 |
2 | Joseph W Vallandingham Jr | Clements, MD 20624 | $26,618 |
3 | Friendly Hall Farm, LLC | Mechanicsville, MD 20659 | $19,604 |
4 | Raley Farms Inc | Mechanicsville, MD 20659 | $16,381 |
5 | Russell Bros LLC | Morganza, MD 20660 | $16,177 |
6 | Raymond M Norris | California, MD 20619 | $16,115 |
7 | James Michael Norris | California, MD 20619 | $16,115 |
8 | Stanley J Boothe | Valley Lee, MD 20692 | $10,964 |
9 | Malcolm E Goode Jr | Maddox, MD 20621 | $9,324 |
10 | James M Bowles | Leonardtown, MD 20650 | $9,176 |
11 | Bachelors Rest Farm LLC | Clements, MD 20624 | $8,659 |
12 | Luther H Wolfe | Chaptico, MD 20621 | $7,480 |
13 | Joseph B Trossbach Jr | Dameron, MD 20628 | $6,525 |
14 | Thomas P Trossbach | Dameron, MD 20628 | $6,525 |
15 | Robert C Cooper | Saint Inigoes, MD 20684 | $4,992 |
16 | Dorothy L Morgan | Mechanicsville, MD 20659 | $4,447 |
17 | Reeves Agri Enterprise | Chaptico, MD 20621 | $4,021 |
18 | James Allen Lacey | Chaptico, MD 20621 | $3,969 |
19 | Deep Creek Farm LLC | Dameron, MD 20628 | $3,702 |
20 | John B Morris Jr | Saint Inigoes, MD 20684 | $3,197 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>