Conservation Reserve Program in Somerset County, Maryland, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 107
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Somerset County, Maryland totaled $455,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert Lee Hall | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $5,202 |
22 | Rudy Hall Jr | Crisfield, MD 21817 | $5,202 |
23 | Rodney Long | Salisbury, MD 21801 | $4,859 |
24 | Cheryl Murphey | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $4,840 |
25 | Linda Townsend | Parsonsburg, MD 21849 | $4,840 |
26 | Lori H Goldsborough | Westover, MD 21871 | $4,789 |
27 | John F Goldsborough | Westover, MD 21871 | $4,789 |
28 | Michael S Thomas | Westover, MD 21871 | $4,573 |
29 | David Medland | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $4,448 |
30 | Frederick Silver | Mount Bethel, PA 18343 | $4,224 |
31 | Eleanor Eberhart | Crisfield, MD 21817 | $4,222 |
32 | Clark H. Willis | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $4,163 |
33 | Kevin P Barr | Chester Springs, PA 19425 | $3,980 |
34 | James B Reese Jr | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $3,825 |
35 | Betty S Long | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $3,796 |
36 | Steve Powell | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $3,747 |
37 | Hildegard Czeczulin | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $3,676 |
38 | Elbert Detwiler | Westover, MD 21871 | $3,488 |
39 | Doris D Henderson | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $3,314 |
40 | David Hoffman Jr | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $3,124 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”