Loan Deficiency in Somerset County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 161
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Somerset County, Maryland totaled $5,791,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Almodington Inc | Fruitland, MD 21826 | $77,599 |
22 | Alexander Brothers | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $76,448 |
23 | S H L Anderson & Son | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $73,837 |
24 | Scot Beauchamp | Westover, MD 21871 | $69,824 |
25 | Widdowson Farms | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $66,602 |
26 | Reginald Layfield | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $65,339 |
27 | Powell Brothers | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $65,211 |
28 | Fred R Moore & Son Inc | Eden, MD 21822 | $62,502 |
29 | Cullen Farms Inc | Crisfield, MD 21817 | $61,330 |
30 | Elton L Powell | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $59,043 |
31 | Douglas L Reading | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $58,210 |
32 | Arthur Hugh Long | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $55,062 |
33 | A & P Farms Inc | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $52,986 |
34 | George W Barnes | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $52,675 |
35 | Glad Mar Grain Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $48,684 |
36 | J Lowell Stoltzfus Sr | Westover, MD 21871 | $48,639 |
37 | James E East | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $48,082 |
38 | Merle R Nelson Jr | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $47,522 |
39 | Kevin Miller | Westover, MD 21871 | $45,397 |
40 | Michael Dryden | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $45,239 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”