Production Flexibility Program in Somerset County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 166
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Somerset County, Maryland totaled $2,755,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Walter Lee West Jr | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $21,470 |
42 | James Hobbs | Fruitland, MD 21826 | $21,327 |
43 | S H L Anderson & Son | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $21,058 |
44 | W & W King Farms | Westover, MD 21871 | $19,612 |
45 | Joseph E Reading | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $18,428 |
46 | H Kevin Anderson | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $17,119 |
47 | John Murray & Sons | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $16,863 |
48 | Kevin Miller | Westover, MD 21871 | $16,547 |
49 | Wm H Wilkins & Sons | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $16,272 |
50 | Ralph Lankford | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $15,972 |
51 | Arthur Hugh Long | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $15,641 |
52 | S H L Anderson & Son | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $15,034 |
53 | Charles Michael Malone | Salisbury, MD 21804 | $14,660 |
54 | Fred R Moore & Son Inc | Eden, MD 21822 | $14,613 |
55 | Douglas L Reading | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $14,242 |
56 | Brian Thomas Johnson | Westover, MD 21871 | $14,063 |
57 | William Waddy | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $13,690 |
58 | William T White | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $13,542 |
59 | Eugene R Kurtz | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $13,478 |
60 | Ring Farms | Westover, MD 21871 | $13,050 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”