Direct Payment Program in Somerset County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 158
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Somerset County, Maryland totaled $5,680,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | John Murray & Sons | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $22,529 |
62 | R Jay Ring III | Westover, MD 21871 | $22,420 |
63 | Ralph Lankford | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $22,384 |
64 | Leonard Howard | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $21,796 |
65 | A & P Farms Inc | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $20,124 |
66 | Perrie Wilson Waters Jr | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $20,048 |
67 | Carlmar Limited Partnership | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $18,872 |
68 | Robert S Fitzgerald | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $18,343 |
69 | J Lowell Stoltzfus Sr | Westover, MD 21871 | $18,089 |
70 | Stanley Jackson | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $17,725 |
71 | Eugene R Kurtz | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $17,256 |
72 | Meadowbrook Farms Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $16,470 |
73 | Robert Smith | Eden, MD 21822 | $15,403 |
74 | Wallace N Bishop | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $15,346 |
75 | Vessey Orchards | Westover, MD 21871 | $15,262 |
76 | James M Long | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $15,101 |
77 | C T Webster & Sons Farm | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $15,077 |
78 | Sandy Ridge Farm, Inc. | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $14,902 |
79 | Charles E Carpenter | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $14,411 |
80 | Doug Green | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $13,547 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”