Loan Deficiency in Somerset County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 161
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Somerset County, Maryland totaled $5,791,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Cottman Farm, Inc. | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $13,961 |
82 | Brice B Long Sr | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $13,832 |
83 | James N Ring Sr | Westover, MD 21871 | $13,702 |
84 | William Long | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $13,597 |
85 | Doug Green | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $13,107 |
86 | Lawrence C Thomas | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $12,802 |
87 | Bill Pennewill | Eden, MD 21822 | $12,696 |
88 | Carroll Ennis | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $12,592 |
89 | Edward T Johnson | Westover, MD 21871 | $11,584 |
90 | Perrie Wilson Waters Jr | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $11,380 |
91 | W & W King Farms | Westover, MD 21871 | $10,982 |
92 | Arthur Lankford Jr | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $10,952 |
93 | William L Rice Jr | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $10,902 |
94 | R & B Farms | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $10,738 |
95 | Phillip Renshaw | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $10,411 |
96 | Carl Senkbeil | Westover, MD 21871 | $10,403 |
97 | Charles Fisher | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $10,135 |
98 | Thomas Lilly | Tyaskin, MD 21865 | $9,512 |
99 | Jeffrey R Brummitt | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $9,083 |
100 | Charles E Carpenter | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $8,777 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”