Farm Subsidy information
Somerset County, Maryland
Total Subsidies in Somerset County, Maryland, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 174
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Somerset County, Maryland totaled $2,401,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Doris C Garner | Westover, MD 21871 | $2,517 |
102 | Joseph E Reading | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $2,516 |
103 | Frances Grace | Halethorpe, MD 21227 | $2,495 |
104 | Steve Beauchamp | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $2,487 |
105 | Clarissa Nazarenus | Severn, MD 21144 | $2,422 |
106 | Michelle Rizzi | Dover, PA 17315 | $2,404 |
107 | Dize Farm LLC | Crisfield, MD 21817 | $2,253 |
108 | Monie Bay Farms Inc | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $2,066 |
109 | Leland Mccollough | St Michaels, MD 21663 | $2,037 |
110 | Bailey Alfred's LLC | Lutherville, MD 21093 | $2,034 |
111 | Lori W. Price | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $1,988 |
112 | Tyler Barr | Chester Springs, PA 19425 | $1,933 |
113 | Teal 1, LLC | Hunt Valley, MD 21030 | $1,924 |
114 | James Bastian | Lewes, DE 19958 | $1,805 |
115 | Steven P Norris Sr | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $1,798 |
116 | Greenspan Corporation | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $1,778 |
117 | Susan E Sigrist Trust | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $1,744 |
118 | John Orth | Upper Fairmount, MD 21867 | $1,690 |
119 | Raymond D Rose | Great Mills, MD 20634 | $1,635 |
120 | Stanley Jackson | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $1,625 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”