Direct Payment Program in Somerset County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 158
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Somerset County, Maryland totaled $5,680,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Brice B Long Sr | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $6,718 |
102 | William G Vessey | Westover, MD 21871 | $6,685 |
103 | James R Mcgrath | Salisbury, MD 21804 | $6,413 |
104 | Michael P Sigrist | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $6,075 |
105 | Bountiful Ridge Farm | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $5,590 |
106 | Luther Hornsby | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $5,550 |
107 | Arthur Howard | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $5,299 |
108 | Marshall's Seafood & Farming | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $5,247 |
109 | Ben C Pennewill | Eden, MD 21822 | $5,049 |
110 | Phillip Renshaw | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $4,740 |
111 | Steve Beauchamp | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $4,680 |
112 | Pittman Carey Jr | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $4,506 |
113 | W Walter Beauchamp | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $4,055 |
114 | Granville Howard Jr | Westover, MD 21871 | $3,788 |
115 | Monie Bay Farms Inc | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $3,559 |
116 | Frank J Smigleski | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $3,199 |
117 | Ennis Farms Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $3,061 |
118 | Frances C Long | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $2,903 |
119 | Francis Lawrence | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $2,714 |
120 | Larry E Leese | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $2,673 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”