Loan Deficiency in Somerset County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 161
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Somerset County, Maryland totaled $5,791,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Thomas Long | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $8,185 |
102 | Thomas R Benson | Westover, MD 21871 | $8,185 |
103 | Frank Thomas | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $8,105 |
104 | Pittman Carey Jr | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $7,827 |
105 | Charles Michael Malone | Salisbury, MD 21804 | $7,656 |
106 | Marshall Seafood & Farming Inc | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $7,540 |
107 | Mark Benton Jr | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $7,127 |
108 | Charles T Webster | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $6,991 |
109 | Michael P Sigrist | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $6,815 |
110 | C T Webster & Sons Farm | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $6,732 |
111 | Arthur Howard | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $6,603 |
112 | Francis Lawrence | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $6,589 |
113 | W Walter Beauchamp | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $6,402 |
114 | Nancy Kay Hall | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $5,893 |
115 | Harold Bell | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $5,544 |
116 | J M Tawes Technical & Career Cent | Westover, MD 21871 | $5,528 |
117 | Candace Anderson Ring | Westover, MD 21871 | $4,977 |
118 | Kenneth Bell | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $4,885 |
119 | Harold R Bell Jr | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $4,774 |
120 | Brummitt Farms LLC | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $4,761 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”