Farm Subsidy information
Somerset County, Maryland
Total Subsidies in Somerset County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 635
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Somerset County, Maryland totaled $54,947,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | John Hartman | Westover, MD 21871 | $81,133 |
122 | Carlye C Carey | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $79,198 |
123 | Mcintyre Brothers LLC | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $79,066 |
124 | Rudy Hall Jr | Crisfield, MD 21817 | $78,361 |
125 | Wallace N Bishop | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $77,128 |
126 | Perrie Wilson Waters Jr | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $76,090 |
127 | Gerald F Frey | Westover, MD 21871 | $72,478 |
128 | Ralph Lankford | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $72,440 |
129 | Tina Eberhart | Parsonsburg, MD 21849 | $72,227 |
130 | Donald Hall | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $72,027 |
131 | William Long | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $71,929 |
132 | Steve Powell | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $71,719 |
133 | Mary Frey | Westover, MD 21871 | $71,301 |
134 | Rhonda Monzeglio | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $70,363 |
135 | Deborah Armstrong | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $70,362 |
136 | Walter Lee West Jr | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $69,959 |
137 | Mark Ennis | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $69,934 |
138 | Jeffrey Garnett | Allen, MD 21810 | $69,538 |
139 | Wm H Wilkins & Sons | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $68,400 |
140 | Elbert Detwiler | Westover, MD 21871 | $68,190 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”