Direct Payment Program in Somerset County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 158
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Somerset County, Maryland totaled $5,680,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Arthur Lankford Jr | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $2,650 |
122 | Otha Shreeves | Westover, MD 21871 | $2,254 |
123 | Neva Rae Howard | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $2,223 |
124 | Percy Bradshaw | Westover, MD 21871 | $2,011 |
125 | Harry Thomas Clark Jr | Salisbury, MD 21804 | $1,869 |
126 | Nancy M Vessey Estate | Westover, MD 21871 | $1,859 |
127 | Ron Poisker | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $1,846 |
128 | Lankford Farms Partnership | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $1,730 |
129 | Wayne Cropper Jr | Dagsboro, DE 19939 | $1,599 |
130 | Howard Green Jr | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $1,407 |
131 | William S Vessey | Westover, MD 21871 | $1,227 |
132 | Chesapeake Renewable Energy LLC | Baltimore, MD 21230 | $1,094 |
133 | Split River Farms Inc | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $1,068 |
134 | Normandy Farm | Westover, MD 21871 | $918 |
135 | James N Ring Jr | Westover, MD 21871 | $675 |
136 | Charles T Webster | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $675 |
137 | J & J Ag LLC | Westover, MD 21871 | $669 |
138 | Virginia P Clark | Salisbury, MD 21804 | $638 |
139 | William Mariner | Salisbury, MD 21804 | $627 |
140 | John E Fleming Sr | Allen, MD 21810 | $627 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”