Farm Subsidy information
Somerset County, Maryland
Total Subsidies in Somerset County, Maryland, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 174
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Somerset County, Maryland totaled $2,401,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Dillon C. West | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $991 |
142 | William L Rice Jr | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $968 |
143 | Lisa Inzerillo | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $958 |
144 | Deborah Wunder | Westover, MD 21871 | $948 |
145 | Barbara Sturgis | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $939 |
146 | Stacey Donohoe | Westover, MD 21871 | $932 |
147 | Michael P Sigrist | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $925 |
148 | C. Todd Widdowson | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $909 |
149 | Stanley A Daniels Jr | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $859 |
150 | Richard Douglas Reynolds Jr | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $825 |
151 | John Dykes | Mason, OH 45040 | $793 |
152 | Mitchell Bonneville Jr | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $786 |
153 | Michael K Edwards | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $786 |
154 | Lance P Thomas | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $779 |
155 | Danny Noble | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $772 |
156 | Christopher D Marlatt | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $630 |
157 | E. Scott Tawes | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $626 |
158 | Percy Bradshaw | Westover, MD 21871 | $621 |
159 | Greg R Shisler | Chester Heights, PA 19017 | $616 |
160 | Robert J Mcintyre | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $612 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”