Farm Subsidy information
Somerset County, Maryland
Total Subsidies in Somerset County, Maryland, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 618
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Somerset County, Maryland totaled $52,044,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert N Shockley | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $331,115 |
22 | Elceed Farms, Inc. | Westover, MD 21871 | $329,225 |
23 | Overholt Farms | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $326,750 |
24 | Widdowson Farms | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $325,277 |
25 | Howard Overholt | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $324,593 |
26 | Michael S. King Sr | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $313,612 |
27 | T & J Farms | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $291,724 |
28 | James N Ring Sr | Westover, MD 21871 | $290,727 |
29 | Brent Cullen | Crisfield, MD 21817 | $283,655 |
30 | James E East | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $277,431 |
31 | Marshall's Seafood & Farming | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $260,496 |
32 | Elton L Powell | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $255,528 |
33 | William Anderson | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $252,808 |
34 | Rantz William Purcell | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $252,752 |
35 | S H L Anderson & Son | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $252,026 |
36 | Nelson Farms | Westover, MD 21871 | $250,892 |
37 | Miller's Mesa Inc | Westover, MD 21871 | $242,438 |
38 | Reginald Layfield | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $235,695 |
39 | Almodington Inc | Fruitland, MD 21826 | $235,641 |
40 | Merle R Nelson Jr | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $230,344 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”