Market Loss Assistance Program in Talbot County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 423
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Talbot County, Maryland totaled $5,554,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | John R Callahan Sr | Cordova, MD 21625 | $65,123 |
22 | Anders Farm | Easton, MD 21601 | $61,787 |
23 | Raymond T Harrison Jr | Easton, MD 21601 | $61,181 |
24 | Edward Rhodes | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $59,808 |
25 | Elsie Mae Rhodes | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $59,808 |
26 | Gordon Behrens | Cordova, MD 21625 | $59,790 |
27 | Charles T Bishop | Queenstown, MD 21658 | $59,678 |
28 | Peck's Point Farm | Easton, MD 21601 | $52,389 |
29 | Phillip E Councell Jr | Cordova, MD 21625 | $51,268 |
30 | Dan K Dulin | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $48,504 |
31 | Christopher Metz | Preston, MD 21655 | $47,210 |
32 | Steven Wade Ortel | Easton, MD 21601 | $46,097 |
33 | Harry A Eaton | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $45,694 |
34 | Mielke Brothers Llp | Easton, MD 21601 | $45,376 |
35 | Charles R Lyons Jr | Easton, MD 21601 | $44,619 |
36 | William C Elben | Cordova, MD 21625 | $40,834 |
37 | Fritz W Mezger | Rehoboth Beach, DE 19971 | $40,453 |
38 | H Wade Dudrow | Easton, MD 21601 | $40,010 |
39 | Allen Family Foods Inc | Seaford, DE 19973 | $39,271 |
40 | R Stanley Collier & Son Inc | Harrington, DE 19952 | $39,170 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”