Farm Subsidy information
Talbot County, Maryland
Total Subsidies in Talbot County, Maryland, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 303
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Talbot County, Maryland totaled $4,695,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Elsie Mae Rhodes | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $23,430 |
42 | Mielke Brothers Llp | Easton, MD 21601 | $23,172 |
43 | Chris Lee And Son Inc | Easton, MD 21601 | $22,047 |
44 | Mt Pleasant Farm Inc | Easton, MD 21601 | $21,902 |
45 | Residuary Trust U/w Of John L Firth | Easton, MD 21601 | $21,402 |
46 | Anders Farm | Easton, MD 21601 | $21,215 |
47 | Skipton Creek Farms Llp | Cordova, MD 21625 | $20,606 |
48 | Miles Creek Limited Partnership | Trappe, MD 21673 | $19,950 |
49 | Harleigh Farm LLC | Oxford, MD 21654 | $19,155 |
50 | Garland T Swann & Sons LLC | Easton, MD 21601 | $18,495 |
51 | Widgeon Point Farm LLC | Oxford, MD 21654 | $17,942 |
52 | John W Ell | Wittman, MD 21676 | $17,570 |
53 | Robin M Lyons | Easton, MD 21601 | $16,150 |
54 | James L Crothers | Easton, MD 21601 | $15,403 |
55 | Little Hopewell Farms Inc., John R Shortall Dba | Easton, MD 21601 | $15,303 |
56 | Henry W Snow III | Cordova, MD 21625 | $15,244 |
57 | Delahay Family Lmtd Partnership | Oxford, MD 21654 | $15,146 |
58 | Eugene Ewing | Easton, MD 21601 | $15,081 |
59 | Sans Souci Farm Association Inc | Mcdaniel, MD 21647 | $14,945 |
60 | Kirby Wharf Investments LLC | Trappe, MD 21673 | $14,936 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”