Conservation Reserve Program in Talbot County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 525
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Talbot County, Maryland totaled $23,429,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Auburn Farm LLC | Easton, MD 21601 | $55,612 |
102 | E J Diefenderfer Trust | Trappe, MD 21673 | $55,087 |
103 | Henry M Shortall Jr | Easton, MD 21601 | $55,065 |
104 | David Foreman | Wye Mills, MD 21679 | $54,817 |
105 | Jeremiah Kratz | Trappe, MD 21673 | $53,626 |
106 | Elisabeth H Dulin Exempt Trust | Cordova, MD 21625 | $53,415 |
107 | Wye Mills Farm Ltd Ptn | Easton, MD 21601 | $53,145 |
108 | National Audubon Society Inc. | Denton, NE 68339 | $51,986 |
109 | E S Diefenderfer | Trappe, MD 21673 | $51,952 |
110 | Rogers Firth | Trappe, MD 21673 | $51,240 |
111 | J Melvin Schwaninger | Trappe, MD 21673 | $51,174 |
112 | Wayne Hockmeyer | Vero Beach, FL 32963 | $50,474 |
113 | Edwin F Hale | Rosedale, MD 21237 | $50,367 |
114 | Billy Shortall | Trappe, MD 21673 | $50,311 |
115 | William Elston Shannahan III | Trappe, MD 21673 | $49,361 |
116 | Donald B Cober | Ellicott City, MD 21042 | $49,174 |
117 | , | $49,040 | |
118 | Richard M Osborne | Oxford, MD 21654 | $49,025 |
119 | Bette S Kenzie | Easton, MD 21601 | $48,522 |
120 | Herbert Gorin | Oxford, MD 21654 | $47,295 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”