Farm Subsidy information
Talbot County, Maryland
Total Subsidies in Talbot County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,060
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Talbot County, Maryland totaled $137,034,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hutchison Bros | Cordova, MD 21625 | $2,779,956 |
2 | Cecil Gannon & Sons Inc | Easton, MD 21601 | $2,632,284 |
3 | Meadow Farm Joint Venture LLC | Easton, MD 21601 | $2,545,198 |
4 | Philip A Foster & Sons | Trappe, MD 21673 | $2,209,787 |
5 | Gustav Schlag | Wittman, MD 21676 | $2,112,120 |
6 | Garrett Bros LLC | Easton, MD 21601 | $1,873,404 |
7 | Roy G Brooks Sr | Easton, MD 21601 | $1,860,742 |
8 | Garland T Swann & Sons LLC | Easton, MD 21601 | $1,667,002 |
9 | Keith R Leaverton | Trappe, MD 21673 | $1,620,534 |
10 | John Swaine III | Royal Oak, MD 21662 | $1,496,082 |
11 | Hans Asmussen & Sons Inc | Trappe, MD 21673 | $1,471,590 |
12 | Edward Rhodes | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $1,368,699 |
13 | Kennedy Farms | Trappe, MD 21673 | $1,268,256 |
14 | John R Callahan Sr | Cordova, MD 21625 | $1,257,624 |
15 | Elsie Mae Rhodes | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $1,239,460 |
16 | Holton Rhodes Jr | Wye Mills, MD 21679 | $1,222,223 |
17 | W Harold Lyons | Easton, MD 21601 | $1,121,642 |
18 | Sylvester Farms Inc | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $1,108,245 |
19 | Dan K Dulin | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $1,069,017 |
20 | Anders Farm | Easton, MD 21601 | $1,045,265 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>