Farm Subsidy information
Talbot County, Maryland
Total Subsidies in Talbot County, Maryland, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,039
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Talbot County, Maryland totaled $130,374,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Michael W Elben | Cordova, MD 21625 | $992,436 |
22 | Mark Sump | Cordova, MD 21625 | $990,182 |
23 | Pcn Farms Llp | Easton, MD 21601 | $923,041 |
24 | Larry A Ewing | Easton, MD 21601 | $916,827 |
25 | Billy Shortall | Trappe, MD 21673 | $893,307 |
26 | Mielke Brothers Llp | Easton, MD 21601 | $838,006 |
27 | Arthur L Foster | Cordova, MD 21625 | $836,019 |
28 | David Altvater | Trappe, MD 21673 | $826,820 |
29 | Mt Pleasant Farm Inc | Easton, MD 21601 | $818,949 |
30 | Gordon Behrens | Cordova, MD 21625 | $811,461 |
31 | John O Brooks Jr | Easton, MD 21601 | $784,408 |
32 | Raymond T Harrison Jr | Easton, MD 21601 | $774,173 |
33 | Cyclops Family Partnership Lp | Oxford, MD 21654 | $756,559 |
34 | Belle Aire Farms Inc | St Michaels, MD 21663 | $752,800 |
35 | Jean Blades | Trappe, MD 21673 | $748,305 |
36 | Irvin Knauer Jr | Trappe, MD 21673 | $741,935 |
37 | Henry M Shortall Jr | Easton, MD 21601 | $739,831 |
38 | Phillip E Councell Jr | Cordova, MD 21625 | $701,574 |
39 | James C Andrew | Easton, MD 21601 | $697,058 |
40 | Councell Ag Services LLC | Cordova, MD 21625 | $665,725 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”