Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Worcester County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 140
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Worcester County, Maryland totaled $6,309,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dale Holland | Greenbackville, VA 23356 | $102,515 |
22 | Mark Drew | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $92,323 |
23 | Byron Hauck | Girdletree, MD 21829 | $89,995 |
24 | Clayville Farm | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $88,957 |
25 | David F Shockley | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $83,983 |
26 | Dale Hastings Farms LLC | Berlin, MD 21811 | $79,959 |
27 | John H Shockley | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $79,753 |
28 | Littleton Family Farms LLC | Berlin, MD 21811 | $77,084 |
29 | David Pilchard | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $74,658 |
30 | Redden Farms | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $71,643 |
31 | Benson Farms Inc | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $71,478 |
32 | Shimar Farms Trust Under The Will Of Mark O Pilcha | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $69,958 |
33 | Douglas A Jones | Berlin, MD 21811 | $69,592 |
34 | Bruning Farms LLC | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $64,649 |
35 | Walter B Widgeon & Son | Berlin, MD 21811 | $61,923 |
36 | Thomas R West Jr | Girdletree, MD 21829 | $51,962 |
37 | Ennis Farms Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $49,394 |
38 | David K Baker Sr | Whaleyville, MD 21872 | $47,681 |
39 | Robert Wilmer Riley Jr | Newark, MD 21841 | $45,809 |
40 | Richard E Jones | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $44,120 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”