Market Loss Assistance Program in Worcester County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 245
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Worcester County, Maryland totaled $3,131,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | James D Powell | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $14,196 |
62 | Wayne Parsons | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $13,970 |
63 | Wm H Wilkins & Sons | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $13,910 |
64 | Virgil L Shockley | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $13,666 |
65 | Brooks Aydelotte | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $13,630 |
66 | Joseph M Holland | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $12,655 |
67 | Walter B Widgeon | Berlin, MD 21811 | $11,682 |
68 | William E Davis Sr | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $11,261 |
69 | Mark Drew | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $10,655 |
70 | Bishop Brothers | Showell, MD 21862 | $10,310 |
71 | John W Carmean | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $9,386 |
72 | Thomas Morris | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $9,173 |
73 | Curtis Shockley | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $9,172 |
74 | James S Elliott | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $8,742 |
75 | Charles H Gordy Jr | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $8,585 |
76 | Hale Harrison | Ocean City, MD 21842 | $8,583 |
77 | Beckyfield Farms Inc | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $8,168 |
78 | Edward T Phillips | Whaleyville, MD 21872 | $7,880 |
79 | Marion Pettit | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $7,543 |
80 | Carlton Magee | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $7,349 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”