Total Conservation Programs in Worcester County, Maryland, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 162
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Worcester County, Maryland totaled $1,042,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | William F West Jr | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $4,055 |
82 | John H Shockley | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $3,990 |
83 | , | $3,506 | |
84 | The Taylor Family Business Inc | Salisbury, MD 21801 | $3,306 |
85 | David M Age | Newark, MD 21841 | $3,244 |
86 | Diane Lambertson - Diane B Lambertson Revocable Tr | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $3,124 |
87 | Sally A Molnar | Berlin, MD 21811 | $3,087 |
88 | , | $3,078 | |
89 | Beckyfield Farms Inc | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $2,977 |
90 | The Nest Inc | Newark, MD 21841 | $2,972 |
91 | Millennium Farms Partnership | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $2,910 |
92 | , | $2,905 | |
93 | John W Bunting | Berlin, MD 21811 | $2,864 |
94 | John W Carmean | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $2,714 |
95 | Thomas W Wilkins | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $2,705 |
96 | David M Evans | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $2,591 |
97 | Charles Alan Pennewell | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $2,402 |
98 | Gary I Ewell Jr | Millsboro, DE 19966 | $2,364 |
99 | Ellen M Truitt | Berlin, MD 21811 | $2,323 |
100 | The Kenneth Margolis Revocable Trust Agreement-ken | Baltimore, MD 21212 | $2,199 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”