Deficiency Payment in Worcester County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 74
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Worcester County, Maryland totaled $353,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Roger L Richardson | Eden, MD 21822 | $26,366 |
2 | Lambertson Farms Inc | Stockton, MD 21864 | $19,474 |
3 | Aydelotte Farms Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $15,889 |
4 | Murray Brothers LLC | Selbyville, DE 19975 | $15,719 |
5 | George B Bounds | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $15,471 |
6 | F A Holland & Sons | New Church, VA 23415 | $14,311 |
7 | Newark Grain Inc | Berlin, MD 21811 | $13,952 |
8 | Glad Mar Farms Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $13,444 |
9 | David F Shockley | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $13,321 |
10 | Thomas West | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $12,028 |
11 | Curtis Shockley | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $9,919 |
12 | M Wayne Lambertson | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $9,530 |
13 | Robinson Bros | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $9,190 |
14 | George Lee Clayville | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $8,787 |
15 | Frances Payne | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $8,537 |
16 | Gary W Pilchard | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $8,257 |
17 | Kirk D Carmean | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $7,935 |
18 | Poplar Ridge Farms Inc | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $7,863 |
19 | Eugene Pilchard | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $7,678 |
20 | Percy S Maddux | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $7,524 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>