Farm Subsidy information
Massachusetts
Total Subsidies in Massachusetts, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 477
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Massachusetts totaled $16,607,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | James P O'shea | Plymouth, MA 02360 | $166,046 |
22 | Calabrese Farms LLC | Southwick, MA 01077 | $164,512 |
23 | Dwight Arnold Farms Inc | Southwick, MA 01077 | $164,381 |
24 | Pine Island Farm Partnership | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $149,365 |
25 | Harju Bog Management | Middleboro, MA 02346 | $149,224 |
26 | Scott D Mullin | West Barnstable, MA 02668 | $145,627 |
27 | Pignatare Farms | Westfield, MA 01085 | $137,948 |
28 | Jonathan Martin | Barnstable, MA 02630 | $135,731 |
29 | Evergreen Honey Co Inc | Billerica, MA 01821 | $124,838 |
30 | Helen Bruce Llewelyn Et Al Ptr | Northfield, MA 01360 | $123,777 |
31 | John D Coward | Southwick, MA 01077 | $121,085 |
32 | Fairview Farms Inc | Whately, MA 01093 | $120,944 |
33 | , | $116,324 | |
34 | Plainville Farm | Hadley, MA 01035 | $115,401 |
35 | Hugh Manheim | South Deerfield, MA 01373 | $114,381 |
36 | Cape Cod Oyster Co Inc | Marstons Mills, MA 02648 | $111,849 |
37 | Corey J Hinckley | Westfield, MA 01085 | $109,744 |
38 | Great Bear Farms Inc | Assonet, MA 02702 | $109,004 |
39 | David Flattery | Provincetown, MA 02657 | $101,262 |
40 | Connor P Doyle | White Horse Beach, MA 02381 | $100,798 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”