Farm Subsidy information
Massachusetts
Total Subsidies in Massachusetts, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 201 to 220 of 912
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Massachusetts totaled $15,978,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
201 | Damion Campbell | Hadley, MA 01035 | $11,876 |
202 | Meadowbrook Orchards Inc | Sterling, MA 01564 | $11,682 |
203 | Thomas Doubleday | Hadley, MA 01035 | $11,599 |
204 | Wagner Wood | Amherst, MA 01002 | $11,581 |
205 | North Hadley Sugar Shack LLC | Hadley, MA 01035 | $11,493 |
206 | Hinckley Farms LLC | Westfield, MA 01085 | $11,475 |
207 | Brian Belder Dba Belder Farm | South Deerfield, MA 01373 | $11,417 |
208 | Lincoln Demoranville | East Freetown, MA 02717 | $11,333 |
209 | Anthony Wendolowski | Hatfield, MA 01038 | $11,300 |
210 | Henry Hauptmann | Hardwick, MA 01037 | $11,115 |
211 | Milky Way Farms Inc | Westport, MA 02790 | $10,948 |
212 | Island Grown Initiative | Vineyard Haven, MA 02568 | $10,816 |
213 | Robert Wallace | South Wellfleet, MA 02663 | $10,811 |
214 | Plainville Farm | Hadley, MA 01035 | $10,693 |
215 | Trustees Of Reservations | Boston, MA 02110 | $10,683 |
216 | Derick Costa | Acushnet, MA 02743 | $10,583 |
217 | Murphy's Farm | Monson, MA 01057 | $10,413 |
218 | Santos Brothers Farm | Westport, MA 02790 | $10,359 |
219 | Jeffrey Sadlowski | Hadley, MA 01035 | $10,306 |
220 | Mark Meacham | Chester, MA 01011 | $10,235 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”