Farm Subsidy information
Massachusetts
Total Subsidies in Massachusetts, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 691
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Massachusetts totaled $15,362,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Boston Honey Company Inc | Holliston, MA 01746 | $69,355 |
42 | Devine Brothers Farm | Hadley, MA 01035 | $66,618 |
43 | Great Brook Dairy LLC | Carlisle, MA 01741 | $65,892 |
44 | Dunajski Dairy Inc | Peabody, MA 01960 | $65,718 |
45 | , | $63,195 | |
46 | Henry M & Edward A Parsons | Westhampton, MA 01027 | $59,788 |
47 | Allard's Farms Inc | S Deerfield, MA 01373 | $58,773 |
48 | Gould Maple Farm Inc | Shelburne Falls, MA 01370 | $57,947 |
49 | Karl Heins | Westminster, MA 01473 | $56,259 |
50 | Chenail Brothers Dairy Farm | Williamstown, MA 01267 | $55,597 |
51 | Shao Zhi Kuo | Montague, MA 01351 | $55,087 |
52 | Christopher Stasinos | Bradford, MA 01835 | $54,578 |
53 | John Ferry Jr | Rehoboth, MA 02769 | $54,331 |
54 | Boyden Bros | Conway, MA 01341 | $53,075 |
55 | Mt Toby Farm | Sunderland, MA 01375 | $52,695 |
56 | Mapleline Farm LLC | Hadley, MA 01035 | $52,446 |
57 | Gunn Farm Inc | Sunderland, MA 01375 | $51,515 |
58 | Cto-chf Partners | Amesbury, MA 01913 | $51,453 |
59 | David Flattery | Provincetown, MA 02657 | $49,446 |
60 | Robertson Farm | Ashfield, MA 01330 | $48,925 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”