Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Massachusetts, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 642
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Massachusetts totaled $1,824,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Daniel Sanden | Phillipston, MA 01331 | $4,253 |
122 | Bertarelli Brothers | Brockton, MA 02301 | $4,163 |
123 | Herron Farms | Greenfield, MA 01301 | $4,151 |
124 | Pomeroy Farm LLC | Westfield, MA 01085 | $4,131 |
125 | Stanley Herzig | Colrain, MA 01340 | $4,127 |
126 | Donald J Bangma Dairy Farm | Uxbridge, MA 01569 | $4,095 |
127 | Walnut Hill Farm | Shelburne Falls, MA 01370 | $4,082 |
128 | David Perkins | Petersham, MA 01366 | $4,047 |
129 | John Brosnahan | Douglas, MA 01516 | $4,046 |
130 | Robertson Farm | Ashfield, MA 01330 | $4,037 |
131 | Theodore Jayko | Cheshire, MA 01225 | $4,032 |
132 | David Freeman | Heath, MA 01346 | $3,982 |
133 | Joseph Pedro | Fall River, MA 02721 | $3,938 |
134 | John Ferry Jr | Rehoboth, MA 02769 | $3,929 |
135 | Brown Homestead | Colrain, MA 01340 | $3,929 |
136 | Arooth Farms | Monson, MA 01057 | $3,920 |
137 | Jeffrey Douglass | Westport, MA 02790 | $3,919 |
138 | Fernando Torres | Fall River, MA 02723 | $3,868 |
139 | Macmillan Dba Cherry Hill Farm | Lunenburg, MA 01462 | $3,807 |
140 | Arthur C Thatcher | Plainfield, MA 01070 | $3,753 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”