Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Massachusetts, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 245
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Massachusetts totaled $595,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Martino's Seafood LLC | Vineyard Haven, MA 02568 | $473 |
142 | Susan R Boyer | Westport, MA 02790 | $463 |
143 | Gabriela Pedro | Westport, MA 02790 | $458 |
144 | Joan R Walker | New Braintree, MA 01531 | $429 |
145 | Osamequin Farm, Inc. | Seekonk, MA 02771 | $427 |
146 | Ellenbecker Family Land Limited Partnership | Olathe, KS 66061 | $421 |
147 | Colin Szawlowski | Hadley, MA 01035 | $413 |
148 | Tims Bees Apiary LLC | Westfield, MA 01085 | $413 |
149 | Wendy Warner | Cheshire, MA 01225 | $408 |
150 | Marianne E Mccarthy | Charlton, MA 01507 | $392 |
151 | Baldwin Farm LLC | West Stockbridge, MA 01266 | $383 |
152 | , | $380 | |
153 | Ann Marie Rapoza | Berkley, MA 02779 | $377 |
154 | Mcdonough Scanlon | West Newbury, MA 01985 | $369 |
155 | Catherine Hansgate | Hubbardston, MA 01452 | $369 |
156 | Hsiu-li C Kelley | Conway, MA 01341 | $365 |
157 | Humble Hands Farm LLC | East Taunton, MA 02718 | $364 |
158 | Francis Santos | Provincetown, MA 02657 | $363 |
159 | Wenona Racicot | Uxbridge, MA 01569 | $361 |
160 | , | $352 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”