Farm Subsidy information
Massachusetts
Total Subsidies in Massachusetts, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 586
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Massachusetts totaled $11,284,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | William Couto | East Taunton, MA 02718 | $73,704 |
22 | Beatons Inc | Wareham, MA 02571 | $73,122 |
23 | Handy Cranberry Trust | Pocasset, MA 02559 | $72,461 |
24 | Mann Farms Inc | Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 | $70,747 |
25 | Stanley Kravitz | Bridgewater, MA 02324 | $69,560 |
26 | Ken Harju & Sons Cranberries | Middleboro, MA 02346 | $68,877 |
27 | Red Eye Cranberry | Duxbury, MA 02332 | $64,507 |
28 | Pine Island Farm Partnership | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $60,932 |
29 | Weston Brothers Cranberries LLC | Carver, MA 02330 | $60,517 |
30 | Harju Bros Cranberries Inc | Middleboro, MA 02346 | $56,166 |
31 | Pride Of Carver Cranberry Limited | Middleboro, MA 02346 | $53,892 |
32 | Bradley P Doyle | Duxbury, MA 02331 | $51,964 |
33 | Westport Rivers Inc | Westport, MA 02790 | $50,522 |
34 | Gregory Shea | Hardwick, VT 05843 | $49,290 |
35 | S K Wainio Bogs Inc | Carver, MA 02330 | $48,099 |
36 | Gilmore Cranberry Company | South Carver, MA 02366 | $47,787 |
37 | Weston Cranberry Corporation | Carver, MA 02330 | $46,190 |
38 | Quaker Run Cranberries LLC | Osterville, MA 02655 | $45,517 |
39 | Indian Brook Cran Bog Inc | Manomet, MA 02345 | $45,191 |
40 | Jordan Dairy Farm Inc | Rutland, MA 01543 | $44,801 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”