Farm Subsidy information
Massachusetts
Total Subsidies in Massachusetts, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 5,737
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Massachusetts totaled $234,982,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Teddy C Smiarowski Farm | Hatfield, MA 01038 | $596,822 |
22 | Earl Palmer & Terry Palmer Inc | Westfield, MA 01085 | $593,890 |
23 | Chang & Sons Enterprises Inc | S Deerfield, MA 01373 | $593,576 |
24 | Louis T Aragi Sr | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $588,942 |
25 | Herrick Dairy Farm LLC | Rowley, MA 01969 | $584,643 |
26 | Marini Farm | Ipswich, MA 01938 | $569,643 |
27 | Five Point Farm | Northfield, MA 01360 | $567,904 |
28 | Morse Bros Inc | East Wareham, MA 02538 | $565,663 |
29 | Tully Farms Inc | Dunstable, MA 01827 | $557,648 |
30 | Devine Farms Inc | Hadley, MA 01035 | $552,724 |
31 | Whittier Farms Inc | Sutton, MA 01590 | $537,734 |
32 | Edward Malinowski & Sons | N Hatfield, MA 01066 | $503,448 |
33 | Santos Brothers Farm | Westport, MA 02790 | $490,768 |
34 | Boston Honey Company Inc | Holliston, MA 01746 | $483,527 |
35 | Edward F Ferry | Swansea, MA 02777 | $482,728 |
36 | Laflamme's Garden Center Inc | Granby, MA 01033 | $478,891 |
37 | Maple Shade Farm Inc | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $470,628 |
38 | Reed Brothers Farm | North Dighton, MA 02764 | $466,109 |
39 | Peter Gibney | Danvers, MA 01923 | $464,959 |
40 | Bruscoe Farms Partnership | Hatfield, MA 01038 | $460,840 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”