Lamb Meat Adjustment Program in Massachusetts, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 112
Recipients of Lamb Meat Adjustment Program from farms in Massachusetts totaled $79,211 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Lamb Meat Adjustment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Paul A Sybertz Jr | Middleboro, MA 02346 | $600 |
42 | Diane Roeder | Florence, MA 01062 | $594 |
43 | Ellen Skillings | Colrain, MA 01340 | $576 |
44 | Alexa Jaffurs | Colrain, MA 01340 | $558 |
45 | Robert E Deibel | East Brookfield, MA 01515 | $455 |
46 | Arthur Lopes | Taunton, MA 02780 | $442 |
47 | Christine Humphrey | New Braintree, MA 01531 | $432 |
48 | John A Buffington | North Dighton, MA 02764 | $424 |
49 | Peter T Poitras | Brimfield, MA 01010 | $415 |
50 | William Tragakis | Medfield, MA 02052 | $411 |
51 | Andrea M Colyer | Hubbardston, MA 01452 | $389 |
52 | Thomas S Carter | Ashfield, MA 01330 | $380 |
53 | Charles York | Shelburne Falls, MA 01370 | $360 |
54 | University Of Massachusetts | Amherst, MA 01003 | $360 |
55 | Robin Casasanto | Charlton, MA 01507 | $355 |
56 | Thomas N Sadin | Savoy, MA 01256 | $333 |
57 | Erwin D Reynolds | Charlemont, MA 01339 | $300 |
58 | Rosalie Pisarczyk | North Brookfield, MA 01535 | $270 |
59 | Judith Bogart | Cummington, MA 01026 | $258 |
60 | J Todd Miles | Millbury, MA 01527 | $252 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”