Farm Subsidy information
Massachusetts
Total Subsidies in Massachusetts, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 5,868
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Massachusetts totaled $266,951,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Bruscoe Farms Partnership | Hatfield, MA 01038 | $460,840 |
62 | Edlin Almeida Jr | Rehoboth, MA 02769 | $457,585 |
63 | Robert D Connors | Danvers, MA 01923 | $456,313 |
64 | Savage Farms Inc | Deerfield, MA 01342 | $454,650 |
65 | Joyner Dairy Farm Inc. | Cummington, MA 01026 | $451,369 |
66 | Westview Farm Inc | Monson, MA 01057 | $451,050 |
67 | Pignatare Farms | Westfield, MA 01085 | $450,894 |
68 | Gary Wilkins Sr | Pepperell, MA 01463 | $450,855 |
69 | Michael T George | Duxbury, MA 02331 | $450,372 |
70 | Smolak Farms LLC | North Andover, MA 01845 | $448,826 |
71 | Gunn Farm Inc | Sunderland, MA 01375 | $446,499 |
72 | Christopher Stasinos | Bradford, MA 01835 | $443,135 |
73 | Agawam Cranberry Company Inc | Wareham, MA 02571 | $437,750 |
74 | Longview Farm | Hadley, MA 01035 | $436,976 |
75 | Westport Rivers Inc | Westport, MA 02790 | $435,740 |
76 | Carlson Orchards Inc | Harvard, MA 01451 | $432,944 |
77 | Full Bloom Market Garden LLC | South Deerfield, MA 01373 | $430,923 |
78 | Handy Cranberry Trust | Pocasset, MA 02559 | $428,901 |
79 | Catlin Farmstead, LLC | Winchendon, MA 01475 | $424,897 |
80 | Peter & Stanley Lapa Partnership | N Hatfield, MA 01066 | $423,462 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”