Total Commodity Programs in Massachusetts, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 523
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Massachusetts totaled $5,947,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Crescent Moon Cranberry LLC | Plympton, MA 02367 | $33,412 |
42 | D And D Harju Cranberries LLC | Middleboro, MA 02346 | $33,302 |
43 | Anne E Love | South Carver, MA 02366 | $32,465 |
44 | John D Mathias | Kingston, MA 02364 | $32,278 |
45 | Bar-way Farm Inc | Deerfield, MA 01342 | $32,175 |
46 | Stephen Peltola | South Carver, MA 02366 | $31,922 |
47 | R M Lawton Cranberries Inc | Middleboro, MA 02346 | $31,845 |
48 | Harju Limited Partnership | Middleboro, MA 02346 | $31,249 |
49 | Turner Farms Inc | South Egremont, MA 01258 | $30,988 |
50 | David M Ross | West Barnstable, MA 02668 | $30,742 |
51 | E J Pontiff Cranberries Inc. | Duxbury, MA 02332 | $29,907 |
52 | Old Tuck Cranberry Corp | West Wareham, MA 02576 | $28,797 |
53 | Milky Way Farms Inc | Westport, MA 02790 | $27,670 |
54 | Raymond L Thacher Jr | South Dennis, MA 02660 | $27,528 |
55 | Bree-z-knoll Farm LLC | Leyden, MA 01337 | $27,410 |
56 | Richard C Woodger | Granville, MA 01034 | $27,345 |
57 | White Dog Ltd | Halifax, MA 02338 | $25,561 |
58 | Carver Middleboro Cranberry Co | Plympton, MA 02367 | $25,388 |
59 | Craig Williams | South Yarmouth, MA 02664 | $25,336 |
60 | Wenham Pond Cranberry Co LLC | Wareham, MA 02571 | $24,739 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”