Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers Program (TAAF) in Barnstable County, Massachusetts, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 160
Recipients of Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers Program (TAAF) from farms in Barnstable County, Massachusetts totaled $605,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers Program (TAAF) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Brendan Adams | Eastham, MA 02642 | $4,404 |
22 | Patrick A Silva | Wellfleet, MA 02667 | $4,404 |
23 | Jonathan Granlund | Orleans, MA 02653 | $4,404 |
24 | Nicholas W Chaprales | Marstons Mills, MA 02648 | $4,404 |
25 | Ben Welsh | South Chatham, MA 02659 | $4,402 |
26 | Roscoe C Chase III | Harwich Port, MA 02646 | $4,399 |
27 | David Young | Eastham, MA 02642 | $4,399 |
28 | Jean Marie Our | Chatham, MA 02633 | $4,399 |
29 | John Fitzgerald | Chatham, MA 02633 | $4,399 |
30 | John L Our Jr | Chatham, MA 02633 | $4,399 |
31 | Greg Tomasian | South Harwich, MA 02661 | $4,399 |
32 | Richard Jeffrey Alberts | South Orleans, MA 02662 | $4,398 |
33 | David A Reed | Orleans, MA 02653 | $4,398 |
34 | Raymond F Westergaard | Orleans, MA 02653 | $4,397 |
35 | Kurt Martin | South Orleans, MA 02662 | $4,397 |
36 | Thomas P Lanahan | Sagamore Beach, MA 02562 | $4,397 |
37 | Jean Lanahan | Sagamore Beach, MA 02562 | $4,397 |
38 | Faith Rushnak | Chatham, MA 02633 | $4,394 |
39 | Glen Fernandes | Harwich, MA 02645 | $4,394 |
40 | Kenneth S Weeks | Harwich Port, MA 02646 | $4,394 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”