Farm Subsidy information
Dukes County, Massachusetts
Total Subsidies in Dukes County, Massachusetts, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 48
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dukes County, Massachusetts totaled $771,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Paul Mcdonald | Vineyard Haven, MA 02568 | $8,750 |
22 | James A Athearn | Edgartown, MA 02539 | $8,631 |
23 | Slip Away Farm LLC | Edgartown, MA 02539 | $8,122 |
24 | Robert Sloane | Chilmark, MA 02535 | $7,206 |
25 | Christopher Stien | Menemsha, MA 02552 | $7,158 |
26 | Matthew Francis Mayhew | Chilmark, MA 02535 | $6,927 |
27 | Scott Castro | Edgartown, MA 02539 | $5,436 |
28 | Island Bee Company | Vineyard Haven, MA 02568 | $5,196 |
29 | John A Larsen | Chilmark, MA 02535 | $4,927 |
30 | Raymond A Gale | Vineyard Haven, MA 02568 | $4,374 |
31 | Lynne Fraker | Vineyard Haven, MA 02568 | $4,374 |
32 | Mitchell Posin | Chilmark, MA 02535 | $4,175 |
33 | Andrew W Woodruff | Vineyard Haven, MA 02568 | $4,013 |
34 | Elisha R Smith | Vineyard Haven, MA 02568 | $3,467 |
35 | Wayne V Iacono | Chilmark, MA 02535 | $3,026 |
36 | Herring Creek Farm Trust | Boston, MA 02210 | $2,588 |
37 | Clarissa Allen | Chilmark, MA 02535 | $2,500 |
38 | John S Stephens | Vineyard Haven, MA 02568 | $2,197 |
39 | Mary Larsen | Chilmark, MA 02535 | $1,458 |
40 | Vineyard Open Land Foundation | Vineyard Haven, MA 02568 | $950 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”