Farm Subsidy information
Dukes County, Massachusetts
Total Subsidies in Dukes County, Massachusetts, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 25
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dukes County, Massachusetts totaled $546,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Morning Glory Farm, Inc. | Edgartown, MA 02539 | $119,795 |
2 | Saunier's Heather Gardens, Inc. | Vineyard Haven, MA 02568 | $92,396 |
3 | Vineyard Gardens | West Tisbury, MA 02575 | $81,646 |
4 | Signature Oyster LLC | Edgartown, MA 02539 | $44,996 |
5 | Cuttyhunk Shellfish Farm Inc | Cuttyhunk, MA 02713 | $30,158 |
6 | Jeremy Scheffer | Chilmark, MA 02535 | $28,680 |
7 | Martha's Vineyard Shellfish Group | Oak Bluffs, MA 02557 | $22,666 |
8 | Honeysuckle Oyster Farm LLC | Edgartown, MA 02539 | $19,989 |
9 | Grey Barn Farm Enterprises LLC | Chilmark, MA 02535 | $16,624 |
10 | Noah Scheffer | Edgartown, MA 02539 | $11,114 |
11 | Rebecca Miller | Chilmark, MA 02535 | $10,786 |
12 | John C Blake | Edgartown, MA 02539 | $8,985 |
13 | Paul Mcdonald | Vineyard Haven, MA 02568 | $8,750 |
14 | Slip Away Farm LLC | Edgartown, MA 02539 | $8,122 |
15 | Mvm Edibles LLC | Edgartown, MA 02539 | $6,993 |
16 | Scott Castro | Edgartown, MA 02539 | $5,436 |
17 | Stephen W Larsen | Chilmark, MA 02535 | $5,416 |
18 | Allen Farm Inc | Chilmark, MA 02535 | $4,230 |
19 | Matthew Francis Mayhew | Chilmark, MA 02535 | $4,226 |
20 | John A Larsen | Chilmark, MA 02535 | $3,418 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>