Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Franklin County, Massachusetts, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 37
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Franklin County, Massachusetts totaled $30,671 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gould Maple Farm Inc | Shelburne Falls, MA 01370 | $3,084 |
2 | Kenneth Herzig Dba West Branch Farm | Colrain, MA 01340 | $2,630 |
3 | Meadowsweet Farm LLC | Hawley, MA 01339 | $2,404 |
4 | Boyden Bros | Conway, MA 01341 | $2,069 |
5 | River Maple Farm Inc | Bernardston, MA 01337 | $1,889 |
6 | Hager Bros Farm LLC | Colrain, MA 01340 | $1,722 |
7 | Bree-z-knoll Farm LLC | Leyden, MA 01337 | $1,315 |
8 | Mark Duprey | Leyden, MA 01301 | $1,089 |
9 | Poplar Hill Farm Inc | West Whately, MA 01039 | $1,069 |
10 | Woodslawn Farm LLC | Colrain, MA 01340 | $1,010 |
11 | Wheel-view Farm | Shelburne Falls, MA 01370 | $1,006 |
12 | Michael Freeman | Heath, MA 01346 | $984 |
13 | Deane Roberts Dba Deane Roberts Farm | Colrain, MA 01340 | $930 |
14 | George Hunt Jr | Orange, MA 01364 | $768 |
15 | Roaming Farm LLC | South Deerfield, MA 01373 | $728 |
16 | Brian Belder Dba Belder Farm | South Deerfield, MA 01373 | $683 |
17 | Bar-way Farm Inc | Deerfield, MA 01342 | $674 |
18 | Joshua H Mason Dba Little Creek Farm | New Salem, MA 01355 | $674 |
19 | , | $662 | |
20 | Jennifer Core | Warwick, MA 01378 | $599 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>