Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Franklin County, Massachusetts, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 146

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Franklin County, Massachusetts totaled $4,814,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
21Charles C TenanesSouth Deerfield, MA 01373$52,383
22Farm Services Agency **Langdon, ND 58249$51,711
23Riverland Farm LLCSunderland, MA 01375$51,311
24Antonellis Farm LLCDeerfield, MA 01342$41,345
25Michael WissemannSunderland, MA 01375$39,610
26Long Plain FarmSouth Deerfield, MA 01373$39,280
27Clarkdale Fruit Farms IncDeerfield, MA 01342$38,309
28George Hunt JrOrange, MA 01364$37,692
29Bree-z-knoll Farm LLCLeyden, MA 01337$37,522
30David Wojciechowski Dba Harvest FS Deerfield, MA 01373$36,654
31Diemand Egg Farm IncMillers Falls, MA 01349$30,507
32Mt Toby FarmSunderland, MA 01375$28,882
33Thomas StorozukSunderland, MA 01375$28,876
34Robertson FarmAshfield, MA 01330$26,269
35Jamison Bagdon Dba Jamison BagdonSunderland, MA 01375$25,743
36Five Point FarmNorthfield, MA 01360$22,406
37Gould Maple Farm IncShelburne Falls, MA 01370$21,234
38Boyden BrosConway, MA 01341$19,920
39Kenneth Herzig Dba West Branch FarmColrain, MA 01340$18,561
40Gunn Farm IncSunderland, MA 01375$18,104

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag