Farm Subsidy information

Franklin County, Massachusetts

Total Subsidies in Franklin County, Massachusetts, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 574

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Franklin County, Massachusetts totaled $36,489,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
21Robertson FarmAshfield, MA 01330$353,548
22Mohawk Orchards IncShelburne Falls, MA 01370$311,191
23Kenneth Herzig Dba West Branch FarmColrain, MA 01340$306,472
24Mt Toby FarmSunderland, MA 01375$287,505
25Patterson Farm LLCSunderland, MA 01375$287,140
26Nourse Farms IncS Deerfield, MA 01373$252,181
27George A Hunt SrOrange, MA 01364$250,446
28Gould Maple Farm IncShelburne Falls, MA 01370$244,893
29Thomas StorozukSunderland, MA 01375$240,576
30Walnut Hill FarmShelburne Falls, MA 01370$230,152
31Mieczyslaw S MieczkowskiMontague, MA 01351$223,586
32Farm Services Agency **Langdon, ND 58249$223,196
33Sunbrite FarmBernardston, MA 01337$222,026
34Mt Toby Farm OldSunderland, MA 01375$217,851
35Albert Hager Jr Dba Hager BrosColrain, MA 01340$217,664
36Thaddeus C Smiarowski III Dba TedSunderland, MA 01375$217,297
37Great Falls Aquaculture LLCTurners Falls, MA 01376$212,936
38Old Yankee FarmNorthfield, MA 01360$207,102
39Thomas SchreiberAshfield, MA 01330$202,840
40Kenneth S Williams IIIDeerfield, MA 01342$200,000

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag