Counter Cyclical Program in Franklin County, Massachusetts, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 47
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Franklin County, Massachusetts totaled $152,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Craig Avery Dba Fort Morrison Farm | Colrain, MA 01340 | $2,172 |
22 | Allan R Flagg | Gill, MA 01354 | $1,875 |
23 | Boyden Bros | Conway, MA 01341 | $1,774 |
24 | Gould Maple Farm Inc | Shelburne Falls, MA 01370 | $1,681 |
25 | Paul Willis Dba Clessons River Farm | Buckland, MA 01338 | $1,600 |
26 | Poplar Hill Farm Inc | West Whately, MA 01039 | $1,550 |
27 | Karen Herzig Dba Coombs Hill Farm | Colrain, MA 01340 | $1,419 |
28 | Ronald Noyes | Greenfield, MA 01301 | $1,371 |
29 | Albert Hager Jr Dba Hager Bros | Colrain, MA 01340 | $1,294 |
30 | Herron Farms | Greenfield, MA 01301 | $1,290 |
31 | Shirley Lilly | Ashfield, MA 01330 | $1,262 |
32 | Karas Farms | South Deerfield, MA 01373 | $1,238 |
33 | Mt Toby Farm Old | Sunderland, MA 01375 | $1,204 |
34 | Robertson Farm | Ashfield, MA 01330 | $1,182 |
35 | Coombs Hill Farm Old | Colrain, MA 01340 | $1,176 |
36 | Graves Glen Farm LLC | Shelburne Falls, MA 01370 | $829 |
37 | Donald G Bolton | Deerfield, MA 01302 | $713 |
38 | Graves Glen Farm Old | Shelburne Falls, MA 01370 | $687 |
39 | Williams Farm Inc | Deerfield, MA 01342 | $683 |
40 | Walter J Kownacki | South Deerfield, MA 01373 | $609 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”