Market Loss Assistance Program in Franklin County, Massachusetts, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 116
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Franklin County, Massachusetts totaled $1,138,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bar-way Farm Inc | Deerfield, MA 01342 | $74,048 |
2 | Five Point Farm | Northfield, MA 01360 | $65,050 |
3 | River Maple Farm Inc | Bernardston, MA 01337 | $47,643 |
4 | Old Yankee Farm | Northfield, MA 01360 | $46,712 |
5 | Gene E Wheeler | Northfield, MA 01360 | $45,887 |
6 | Walnut Hill Farm | Shelburne Falls, MA 01370 | $44,096 |
7 | Yazwinski Farm Partnership | Deerfield, MA 01342 | $39,828 |
8 | George A Hunt Sr | Orange, MA 01364 | $35,330 |
9 | Gunn Farm Inc | Sunderland, MA 01375 | $32,480 |
10 | Peila Brothers | Bernardston, MA 01337 | $29,466 |
11 | Joan Crowley Dba Deerfield Farm | South Deerfield, MA 01373 | $27,492 |
12 | Lil Hi Farm | Ashfield, MA 01330 | $26,704 |
13 | Gould Maple Farm Inc | Shelburne Falls, MA 01370 | $26,030 |
14 | Mt Toby Farm Old | Sunderland, MA 01375 | $24,325 |
15 | Thomas Schreiber | Ashfield, MA 01330 | $22,869 |
16 | Patrick H Bennett | Westport, NY 12993 | $20,953 |
17 | Boyden Bros | Conway, MA 01341 | $20,637 |
18 | Stanley Herzig | Colrain, MA 01340 | $17,452 |
19 | Joseph C Tatro | South Deerfield, MA 01373 | $16,278 |
20 | Albert Hager Jr Dba Hager Bros | Colrain, MA 01340 | $15,962 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>