Farm Subsidy information
Middlesex County, Massachusetts
Total Subsidies in Middlesex County, Massachusetts, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 272
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Middlesex County, Massachusetts totaled $18,645,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Carlisle Cranberries Inc | Carlisle, MA 01741 | $158,001 |
22 | Thomas Hanson | Framingham, MA 01701 | $155,850 |
23 | Honey Pot Hill Orchards | Stow, MA 01775 | $153,890 |
24 | Nagog Fruiters Inc | Littleton, MA 01460 | $146,253 |
25 | Parlee Farms LLC | Tyngsboro, MA 01879 | $138,512 |
26 | Spring Brook Farm | Littleton, MA 01460 | $127,065 |
27 | Groton Fruit Farms Inc | Ayer, MA 01432 | $123,798 |
28 | Kimball Fruit Farm, LLC | Hollis, NH 03049 | $117,364 |
29 | Idyllvale Farm | Littleton, MA 01460 | $112,401 |
30 | Peter A Macarthur | Holliston, MA 01746 | $107,070 |
31 | James H Pickard | Littleton, MA 01460 | $104,296 |
32 | John A Ogonowski | Dracut, MA 01826 | $103,713 |
33 | Verrill Farm LLC | Concord, MA 01742 | $103,703 |
34 | Henry G Parlee Jr | Chelmsford, MA 01824 | $102,155 |
35 | Eric Ferjulian | Hudson, MA 01749 | $93,915 |
36 | Douglas Times | Tyngsboro, MA 01879 | $92,036 |
37 | Carver Hill Orchards | Stow, MA 01775 | $90,339 |
38 | H & D Partnership | Pepperell, MA 01463 | $85,726 |
39 | S H & D Partnership | Pepperell, MA 01463 | $85,317 |
40 | Crescent Farm LLC | Ward Hill, MA 01835 | $85,115 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”