Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers Program (TAAF) in Plymouth County, Massachusetts, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 209
Recipients of Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers Program (TAAF) from farms in Plymouth County, Massachusetts totaled $797,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers Program (TAAF) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Paul T Krzyzewski | Marshfield, MA 02050 | $4,425 |
22 | Joyce Twomey | Green Harbor, MA 02041 | $4,425 |
23 | Sean P Mccarthy | Hanover, MA 02339 | $4,425 |
24 | David Magee | Mattapoisett, MA 02739 | $4,425 |
25 | Douglas Donovan | Moscow, ID 83843 | $4,425 |
26 | Karl Drake | Marion, MA 02738 | $4,425 |
27 | Patrick A Twomey | Green Harbor, MA 02041 | $4,425 |
28 | Dana Unangst | Marshfield, MA 02050 | $4,425 |
29 | Peter C Picken | N Chelmsford, MA 01863 | $4,423 |
30 | Michael Lane | Scituate, MA 02066 | $4,420 |
31 | Michael Marshall | Brant Rock, MA 02020 | $4,420 |
32 | Jason Fraser | Plympton, MA 02367 | $4,420 |
33 | Robert Ward | White Horse Beach, MA 02381 | $4,416 |
34 | Aja Oehme | Plympton, MA 02367 | $4,415 |
35 | Wayne A Nickerson | Kingston, MA 02364 | $4,414 |
36 | Scott Leddin | Pembroke, MA 02359 | $4,414 |
37 | Stanley Mazalewski | Plymouth, MA 02360 | $4,414 |
38 | Luke Holmes | Plymouth, MA 02360 | $4,414 |
39 | Denise Glynn | Marshfield, MA 02050 | $4,414 |
40 | William P Glynn | Marshfield, MA 02050 | $4,414 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”