Total Conservation Programs in Plymouth County, Massachusetts, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 159
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Plymouth County, Massachusetts totaled $890,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | James F Shephard Jr | Carver, MA 02330 | $1,225 |
122 | Carl Hubacheck | Mattapoisett, MA 02739 | $1,175 |
123 | John B Bourne | Buzzards Bay, MA 02532 | $1,130 |
124 | Brett W Meredith | South Carver, MA 02366 | $1,125 |
125 | John C Andresen II | Duxbury, MA 02331 | $1,028 |
126 | Russell S Willis | Middleboro, MA 02346 | $1,000 |
127 | Robert M Andrews | Plympton, MA 02367 | $1,000 |
128 | Eight Mates Trust | Kingston, MA 02364 | $1,000 |
129 | Vincent De Jesus | New Bedford, MA 02745 | $959 |
130 | Paul Hunt | Lakeville, MA 02347 | $825 |
131 | Wayne E Dunham | South Carver, MA 02366 | $812 |
132 | Robert D Cloutier | Swansea, MA 02777 | $809 |
133 | Godfrey Cranberry Co | East Wareham, MA 02538 | $780 |
134 | Beaverbrook Cranberry Co Inc | West Wareham, MA 02576 | $780 |
135 | Paul H Whipple | Plymouth, MA 02360 | $750 |
136 | Black Brook Ranch | Middleboro, MA 02346 | $735 |
137 | Matthew N Rhodes | East Wareham, MA 02538 | $700 |
138 | Wayne A Hannula | Carver, MA 02330 | $700 |
139 | Sidney J Pires Jr | West Wareham, MA 02576 | $700 |
140 | P & S Cranberry Service | West Wareham, MA 02576 | $680 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”