Farm Subsidy information
Plymouth County, Massachusetts
Total Subsidies in Plymouth County, Massachusetts, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 90
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Plymouth County, Massachusetts totaled $992,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bruce A Maksy Jr | Rochester, MA 02770 | $5,927 |
22 | Stephen Peltola | South Carver, MA 02366 | $5,926 |
23 | Gnorwood Garden Center Inc. | Brockton, MA 02301 | $5,880 |
24 | Bluemoon Oyster Co LLC | Duxbury, MA 02332 | $5,688 |
25 | North Weston Cranberries Inc. | Carver, MA 02330 | $5,553 |
26 | E J Pontiff Cranberries Inc. | Duxbury, MA 02332 | $4,301 |
27 | Richard G Burnet | Plympton, MA 02367 | $4,292 |
28 | Weston Cranberry Corporation | Carver, MA 02330 | $3,837 |
29 | Donald A Wilkinson | Plymouth, MA 02360 | $3,596 |
30 | Eric R Weston | Carver, MA 02330 | $3,181 |
31 | Steven Rittenhouse | Acushnet, MA 02743 | $3,097 |
32 | Lunar Fruits LLC | Scituate, MA 02066 | $3,029 |
33 | Benefits Go Live Inc | Mattapoisett, MA 02739 | $2,885 |
34 | Ronald W Drollett | Plympton, MA 02367 | $2,807 |
35 | Mother Shucker Oyster Co. | Plymouth, MA 02360 | $2,714 |
36 | Alex Johnson & Sons Ptnrs | South Carver, MA 02366 | $2,351 |
37 | Anderson Brothers Farm | West Bridgewater, MA 02379 | $2,321 |
38 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $2,286 |
39 | Ruth Sylvester | Hanson, MA 02341 | $2,282 |
40 | Joseph Pierce | Duxbury, MA 02332 | $1,929 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”